ScenariosWFH Revocation

Work-from-Home Revoked After Filing a Complaint

When a privilege disappears right after you exercised a protected right.

Content last verified against official statutes: March 30, 2026

Context and Setup

You have been working from home three days a week for the past year with no performance issues. Two weeks ago, you filed a formal harassment complaint under SOR/2020-130. Today, your manager informed you that your work-from-home arrangement is being revoked effective immediately, citing a "business need." No other team members have had their arrangements changed.

The Conversation

You

I received your message about the WFH change. Can you help me understand the business reason for this?

Start by requesting the rationale. You want the employer to state their reason on the record so you can test it later.

Manager

The team needs more in-office collaboration. We need people in the office.

You

I understand. Is this change applying to the entire team, or just to me?

This question is designed to expose selective application. If only you are affected, the business need explanation weakens significantly.

Manager

We are starting with your role for now.

You

I see. I want to note that this change is occurring two weeks after I filed a formal complaint. Under CLC s.246.1, any adverse change to working conditions following the exercise of a protected right raises reprisal concerns. I would like the business justification for this change documented in writing, including when the decision was made and by whom.

You are connecting the dots on the record without being hostile. Requesting documentation forces the employer to either produce a paper trail or admit one does not exist.

Manager

This has nothing to do with your complaint.

You

I appreciate you saying that. To protect both of us, I would like that confirmed in writing along with the business rationale. If there is documentation showing this change was planned before my complaint, I would like to see it.

This is a reasonable request. If the employer cannot produce pre-complaint documentation supporting the decision, the timeline speaks for itself.

What to Document After

  • Date of WFH revocation versus date of your complaint (establish the timeline gap).
  • Manager's stated reason and whether it was in writing.
  • Whether any other employees were similarly affected.
  • Any prior communications about your WFH arrangement (approvals, positive feedback, no issues raised).
  • Follow-up email: "Confirming our conversation today regarding the revocation of my work-from-home arrangement. You indicated the reason is [stated reason]. This change affects only my role. Please provide the documentation supporting this business decision, including when it was planned and approved. I want to note that this change follows my formal complaint filed on [date] and I am documenting this for the record."
  • Save your original WFH agreement and any prior approval emails.

Escalation Options

File a CIRB reprisal complaint under CLC s.246.1 within 90 days of the WFH revocation. The timeline (complaint filed, then privilege revoked) is your strongest evidence.
90-day deadline
The employer bears the burden of proof under CLC s.246.1(4) to demonstrate the change was not connected to your complaint.
If the revocation causes health impacts (for example, if WFH was an accommodation for a medical condition), file a CHRC complaint for failure to accommodate under CHRA s.7.
1-year deadline
Continue documenting any further changes to your working conditions.

Key Statutes

CLC s.246.1Reprisal protection for exercising any right under the Code
CLC s.246.1(4)Reverse burden of proof — employer must prove action was not reprisal
CHRA s.7Failure to accommodate disability if WFH was a medical accommodation
SOR/2020-130Workplace harassment and violence prevention

When Should You Contact a Lawyer?

This platform is designed to help you build your case independently — collecting evidence, documenting incidents, writing complaints in compliance language, and navigating the internal HR process. Many employees can handle these steps without a lawyer.

The most effective time to engage a lawyer is after you have completed the internal process and your employer has failed to resolve your complaint. At that point, a lawyer can review your complete file — your timeline, evidence, complaint, and the employer's response — and provide strategic advice before you file with an external body such as the CIRB, CHRC, or OPC.

By doing the groundwork yourself, your consultation becomes a focused strategic review rather than a costly fact-gathering session. This approach has been validated by employment lawyers who reviewed files prepared using this methodology and found the documentation thorough with nothing to add.

Did this help you?

MyWorkRights.ca is free for every Canadian worker. If this information helped you, consider supporting the project. Every dollar goes toward keeping this site updated and reaching more employees who need it.

Powered by Stripe

Cite This Page

MyWorkRights.ca, "Work-from-Home Revoked After Filing a Complaint," accessed 2026-04-01, https://myworkrights.ca/scenarios/wfh-revocation

Written by the MyWorkRights.ca team, based on direct experience navigating the CIRB, OPC, and CHRC complaint processes and 500+ hours of employment law research.